. . . . right.
so where to begin. the start, i guess. dozens upon dozens of pieces to upload and post that tell some kind of a story of going through a dark period last october into november, drawings for the most part but which - i think - don't necessarily make for easy viewing.
someone you love deeply almost dying kind of has. . . an adverse reaction on your work. and work into that other things going on at the same time - they were some pretty dark times. 'pretty' pictures' are not made on darker days. . .
thus, we'll begin with some leftovers - some rescans, some unposted stuff, some from as early as last spring, a couple of others from early october. before, you could say. . . and again, some i like, some i'm posting because emma - the subject, as ever - likes them, and some are better than others. . .
a note - i work from my imagination. i don't use photographs, i don't draw from life. i used to do both, but, especially working from photographs for a few years led me to a place where i became VERY dependant upon reference material and when it came to drawing from the top of my head, once my favourite way to work, i became overly critical of everything i produced, and that. . . bled into my other work. the decision to NOT work from source material has pros and cons - sometimes for example, the likeness of a person is lost a little in favour of capturing more some essence of them. i couldn't say whether that's a pro or a con, it's just something that is. some of what i do comes off very stylised, some doesn't. my brain decides. it's. . . i think, as honest a way to draw, or paint as there is.
so. some of it is better than others. but even the weaker stuff has elements i like. as you'll see when everything 'kicks off' in the next entry, the aesthetic goal of everything looking 'right' sort of goes out of the window in favour of expressive, visceral purging. and it does very much become about imagination, and abandoning old, finnicky, realist habits. . .
these, meanwhile, mostly speak for themselves, though some liner notes might be helpful. i'll post those at the end.
'liner notes':
1- the 'very short-haired emma' drawing is an oldie. about a year ago she had her hair cut almost - but not quite - that short, something she immediately regretted and fortunately her hair grows almost freakishly fast, the progression of which can be seen over the course of the other drawings, although it's often hard to put older stuff in chronological order because i - to appease her unease over how short her hair was - more often than not drew her with LONGER hair. . .
2- the dark, inky 'sleeping emma' piece that follows is one of my favourite pieces from last year. acrylic/ink on board, this kind of thing i feel i'm 'in my element', it's messy and loose in places (okay, most of it) and then finnicky in others like the hair. i also really liked that wing / shadow because it could be either, but wouldn't have worked with the usual, standard owl's wing. and more on owls, later. . .
3- the single, colour piece is me messing around with watercolours, not especially liking it and then inking lines over the whole thing. and yes, i know her head is disproportionately large. her head isn't that big in real life, i promise. i should also point out that she doesn't wear that cardigan ALL the time. i'm just especially fond of it. . .
4- the three panel piece. this is from the 'book of emma' and dates back to about the same time as a similar, almost comic book page. i like this a lot, even though as emma pointed out before i was even finished drawing the thing, the third panel looks more like sarah from 'chuck', which we'd not long watched. that's the subconscious for you. some you win, some you lose. . .
5- ears. some of those are emma's, some of them are mine. and some of them are composites. i was clearly a bit OCD that particular day.
. . . and the last two were the last two done BEFORE everything went. . . dark. the humour and prettiness of these is all but missing from what follows.
so these were as good a place as any to begin all this again . . .
Suitable only for adults now! :P
ReplyDeleteExperimentation? I can't wait to see these darker pieces next
These are GOOD Iain. Your work's changed some way I can't pinpoint but fundamentally stayed the same. And GOOD!
I wish you did have more confidence in yourself though :(
That Cardigan! :P
ReplyDeleteI remember you doing all those ears, you were majorly obsessing! :P
There's so much feeling in some of these drawings. I love them and I don't say that because I can't be impartial. You have drawn things I've not liked much and I've told you so.
Some of those you will probably be posting next, right?
I agree with Sarah as well. Especially in terms of your lack of confidence.
"Your work's changed some way I can't pinpoint but fundamentally stayed the same" I agree! Iain, your work's changed a lot even since last year.
I know you stopped being so worried about pictures looking a certain way after November and thank *God*!
I think you've gotten so out of the way of sharing your work you expect nobody to want to see it though.
Which is shite, Mister. I love your art and I know Gemma and Sarah do too.
If you've got 3 fans you've got summat, right? ;)
Now post more!
And tell people when you've posted a new blog - We're not Mind-readers!
ReplyDeleteWhat the? The date on this post is Monday March 1, but it doesn't show up in my blog reader (which I didn't check over the weekend) until Saturday?? Based on Emma's comments, sounds as if both you AND your blog are conspiring to keep people from reading it.
ReplyDeleteThese are all so, so pretty. I love seeing this much work from you and knowing you're really working hard. Some new to me, some not - now with liner notes.™
I actually really like the watercolor piece and was surprised when I read your comments. The colors are nice, very nice, especially in the face. (Maybe I'm just obsessed with faces - sorry.) It's interesting to see you work in a different medium and see what changes and what stays the same - for instance, the layered, textured-looking colors in the skin, the red and blue.
I'm blown away by the fact that you don't use reference photos. You might have guessed that I do. It's amazing that you're drawing all of these from memory, and they look exactly like the people they're supposed to. (Or I assume they do, haha. What I mean is that they're consistent - that's you and that's Emma as far as I'm concerned.)
Did you all really dress up like total bad-asses for Halloween?
Please keep posting. Post more. Don't get discouraged. Your work is actually kind of inspiring to me, to tell you the truth. I've held neither pen, pencil, nor paintbrush in over a year, but there are times when you make me think, Oh, maybe I will. This weekend. After I make that smoothie recipe I've been wanting to try. After I get in a couple hours of reading, video games, and the usual self pity and general laziness.
I'm really, truly looking forward to seeing this next phase of your work.
okay, i meant to reply to these earlier but was more about just getting that first batch of messy inky pieces up today. so. . . one at a time.
ReplyDeleteSARAH: thank you. funny, someone told me recently that i'm 'different but the same', and i guess the art i've been producing falls into this too. i know what you mean, though. i think these are kind of me in my comfortable element as well, though. i've always felt safer producing drawings than paintings, probably why there are more of the former than the latter on this blog. . . as to the adult content thing. well, that's more about giving spammers one more page they have to go through. i figure such a thing'll discourage them, right? in theory. . .
EMM: i think given that yoiu saw this work as it was produced you have a different viewpoint than, say, people seeing it all together for the first time, especially in context with what follows - the black stuff - and then again what follows that - GOOD work i actually LIKE for a change. . . i think october/november was a shock to the system. sometimes i guess you need that artistically speaking. i like these a lot, but to some degree it feels like they were done about a decade ago now. . . thank you, for. . . well, everything. you've been a hell of a sidekick, patron, muse. . . guardian angel.
BRON: firstly, there's MORE watercolour stuff to come, some of it could actually be called PRETTY.
but yeah no photographic reference. which was a biggie and something that took time. memory was how i worked right up until after art school when i think things ceased coming so naturally. refernece became first a crutch and then a necessity and unfortunately this made drawing from memory again very difficult, but. . .
i think it's fine to use reference, and for most people they can pull it off, but with me it had become very constraining. not just in making me feel that everything had to LOOK a certain way, but even compositionally.
i'd lost a lot of the looseness and spontaneity i'd once had when i had, frankly, been much more at ease with sitting down and churning work out rather than taking forever to DO one painting.
'100 heads' is a perfect example of where using photoghraphic refrence tripped me up- i became obsessed with producing specifically realistic portraits rather than had i just worked from memory. . . if i'd done THAT, i'd have completed the project probably the first time i attempted it. . .
and sometimes i like what i do, sometiems i think 'that doesn't look like her' but it's no longer the end of the world. i don't throw my hands in the air and not draw for two weeks - i just start another :)
i mean, i still have some way to go before i'm completely back to feeling as confident as i once did, but. . . i'm getting there. as you'll see, later. there's definitely a change in the stuff i'm doing now. . .
anyway, thank you. and get thee drawing again! it has to be time for another 'bronwen as velma sparrow' ;)